Clarity
Can someone get the point of each slide in a few seconds?
Clear, specific notes before you present.
Start with your PowerPoint (.pptx)
Clarity
Shorten the slide title to one line.
Structure
Increase the chart label size.
Visual hierarchy
Keep the opening message on its own slide.
82/100
Illustrative score
Clear structure overall. Three slides need changes before you present; each note says which and why.
Each note names the issue, points to the slide and gives one useful change.
q3-sales-review.pptx · 12 slides
Illustrative example
Each slide makes one point. Keep the title as the takeaway.
A−Move the pricing slide before the case study, so the story builds to the ask.
BMake the chart title the largest text, so the audience reads the point first.
B−Too many words. Split each into two slides so the back row can read them.
C+B+Overall grade
Clear slides and a sound order. Fix the two wordy slides first: they matter most to the audience.
Can someone get the point of each slide in a few seconds?
Do the slide titles, read in order, tell the story?
Can the back row read it, and is there little enough to read?
Does the deck look like one person made it?
Grade it early enough to fix what the report finds.
Add the PowerPoint file you plan to present.
See an overall grade plus grades for clarity, structure, readability and design.
Each note points to specific slides and says what to change.
Make the changes and upload again to see the difference.
Different presentations go wrong in different ways. The report points to the slides that need attention.
Spot wordy slides and gaps in structure before your tutor marks the deck, then upload the fixed version.
Check that a take-home case or first-months plan reads clearly and flows from problem to recommendation.
Catch inconsistent fonts, crowded tables and buried conclusions before the deck goes to the client.
See whether every slide earns its place and the story moves from problem to ask without detours.
Test whether text is large enough for a hall and whether slides support the talk rather than repeat it.
Check that dense findings are readable and the argument is easy for a panel to follow.
Every report is marked against the same rubric, so you can see exactly where a grade came from.
Decks where slides try to say too much at once
Long decks, pitches and talks that need to build
Big screens, big rooms and decks read on a phone
Decks stitched together from several authors
Most people check their slides somehow. Here is how the usual approaches compare.
| Compared on | Rehearsing on your own | Asking a colleague | PPT Grader |
|---|---|---|---|
| What you get | Your own sense of how it went | An honest opinion, if they have time | A grade per area plus slide notes |
| Consistency | Depends on how tired you are | Varies by who you ask | Same rubric every time you upload |
| Specific slides flagged | Only the ones you notice | Often, if they go through it closely | Each note points to specific slides |
| Delivery and timing | Yes, you hear yourself speak | Yes, if they watch you rehearse | Reviews the slides, not your delivery |
| Re-checking after fixes | Run through it again | Ask them for another look | Upload again to see the difference |
| Your slides | Unchanged | Unchanged | Unchanged; you decide what to fix |
This compares approaches, not other products. Rehearsing and a trusted reviewer still matter; the report complements them.
If the review shows the deck needs rebuilding rather than fixing, start a fresh draft with Presentations.AI.
Any presentation you can't afford to get wrong is worth a second look.
Check clarity and structure before you're marked on it.
Make sure your case or 90-day plan is clear and well-paced.
Catch wordy slides and weak structure before the client sees them.
Test readability for a big screen and a big room.
Check that the story flows and every slide earns its place.
Get structure and readability right before the panel.
Make the update easy to follow for busy leaders.
Check that slides support learning instead of overwhelming it.
A complete pre-presentation checklist covering your message, structure, slides, readability, rehearsal and the room, so you walk in knowing what to fix.
26 Oct 2026Article · 4 min readHow to design charts that work on a slide: decide the message first, pick a chart that shows it, strip the clutter and use one highlight colour.
27 Oct 2026Article · 4 min readA calm review to run on your pitch deck before you meet investors: the story, the numbers, the ask, slide readability and the files you send ahead.
27 Oct 2026Article · 5 min readA practical way to rescue a deck buried in text: find the worst slides, pull out each point, move detail to your notes and swap lists for simple visuals.
27 Oct 2026A tool that reviews presentation slides and gives practical feedback on clarity, structure, readability and design.
PowerPoint (.pptx) files.
No. It gives feedback; you decide what to change.
Anyone preparing an important presentation: students, job candidates, founders, consultants and speakers.
Each grade summarises one area, such as clarity or readability. The notes beside it explain what to fix.
For a presented slide, a headline and a few short phrases. Treat anything well over about 40 words as worth a second look. Reading decks can carry more.
Yes. Upload a revised version to see how your changes affect the review.
No. It reviews the slides, not your delivery or timing. Rehearse out loud, ideally in front of someone, as well.
Upload the deck you plan to present, read the notes slide by slide, then fix and re-check.